IMG_3386 (640x481)If we agree the primary objective of stock-picking is to pick the winners and/or avoid the losers, then we must start with a framework that helps determine which companies to include.

For the vast majority of investors, this begins with a screening process to reduce the direct share universe down to a manageable number. The problem is that most screening processes involve no validation despite the fact there is an abundance of academic literature on the topic.

In the Investing Times attempts to offer logic, academic rigour and validity to this screening process. The idea is to assess the stock universe using the 3 F’s of Investing – Fear, Fundamentals and Forces – which leads us to 17 factors that each have academic support in contributing to out-performance. They generally aim to achieve dividend strength, growth, value, stability, momentum, sector bias and pricing acknowledgement.

17 factors sharemarketThis allows us to illustrate a number of “optimal” portfolios across differing styles – including balanced, stability-focused, dividend-strength, deep-value, growth-bias and sector rotation (we highlight optimal because it is subject to varies weaknesses we are transparent about).

The underpinnings that make the research different to others is that it focuses heavily on relativity to the sector median. This is vital and a key advantage to creating out-performance on a risk-adjusted basis. For example, a utility company (typically with a high depreciation expense) should not be compared to a bank as their earnings and cash-flow are accounted for very differently. Therefore, our logic implies that the Price to Earnings ratio should be isolated and compared by sector rather than by market.

Our data has allowed us to stress-test the outcomes of a stock universe over 6 years, involving more than 850 data validation periods. We acknowledge this isn’t nearly enough to have outright conviction, however we believe a combination of 6 years of stress testing along with a body of academic literature supporting the underlining metrics is a form of validation.

Creating a portfolio using the 17 metrics

As the founder of the Investing Times and Australian Investors Association, Austin Donnelly always said, “There is a difference between a good company and a good investment”. BHP may be a good company but it is not a good investment if you buy it at the peak of a mining boom. Therefore, the idea is to create a portfolio of investments with strong fundamentals and attractive pricing. The logic is that if any of the 17 indicators hinted to a buy signal, these are recorded and scored. If all seventeen indicators are suggesting underlying appeal, there is a reasonable likelihood of strong future performance.

If you wish to see the net result and top 20 holdings using this fundamental rigour, we encourage you to request the latest report as a free one-off trial. We will send this via email as a value-add with no obligations or cost.

Trial today

RECOMMENDED BY THE INVESTING TIMES

Worried about a property crash? These nine facts answer it better than most…

| Investing Times News, Lifestyle, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
What causes a property market to crash? Is it a falling economy? An unemployment outburst? A building oversupply? Should we concentrate on consumer confidence data? Or is it as simple...

Long-term investment themes: 10 year + view of the trends, opportunities and challenges

| Economy, Investing Times News, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
Drawing attention to the outlook and big themes present in the economy is always a healthy perspective. Below are a number of key themes to think about as you monitor your...

Facts about the Chinese economy: How likely is a financial crisis in China?

| Economy, Investing Times News, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
China is undoubtedly important to the global economy and with embedded signs of rising bad debts, there are enormous concerns surrounding China’s ongoing stability. Since 2005, China has accounted for...

It’s not (totally) the baby boomers fault: Why the working population matters most

| Most Viewed, Politics, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments

We have an unprecedented rise in the over 65 age group and our working population is growing at a more modest rate. This article will detail the real problems we face and how you can profit from it.

MOST VIEWED

17 stock metrics: value, growth, dividend strength, stability, momentum and sector analysis

| Investing Times News, Most Viewed, Share-Market | No Comments
If we agree the primary objective of stock-picking is to pick the winners and/or avoid the losers, then we must start with a framework that helps determine which companies to...

Recession risks: what are 10 of the top indicators to watch and why it works.

| Economy, Headline Article, Most Viewed | No Comments
What does it take to identify an impending recession? Obviously, this is an extremely complex question. However, there are at least 10 factors that have had a strong historical track-record...

Can Warren Buffett and Robert Shiller both be wrong at the same time? Unlikely.

| Headline Article, Investing Times News, Most Viewed, Share-Market | No Comments
Warren Buffett and Robert Shiller should be familiar names to anyone with an active interest in the share-market. They are two of the most respected individuals on the planet when...

It’s not (totally) the baby boomers fault: Why the working population matters most

| Most Viewed, Politics, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments

We have an unprecedented rise in the over 65 age group and our working population is growing at a more modest rate. This article will detail the real problems we face and how you can profit from it.