It should not come as a controversial statement (at least within the context of this article) that the world is set to suffer from a slowing-population problem as well as an ageing population problem.

We are already seeing the growth rates slow drastically across key economies, which is mostly due to a combination of a falling birth rate (less people choosing to raise large families) and a slowing death rate (people living longer). The migration rate also plays an important role, although is variable depending on the country in question.

India is a stand-out over the next 15 years

Overall, India remains well placed in absolute terms, with their population expected to grow at approximately 1.0% for the 2016-2030 period. To put the importance of this in context, China appears set to see its population growth slow to just 0.2% as a consequence of their historical one-child policy (the change in policy is not expected to help for decades), and worse still, is set to fall nominally in 2026. Australia remains quite small and nimble on a global scale, and despite an overall population increase from 7.4 million in 1945 to close to approximately 25 million today, is expected to continue growing close to 0.9%pa over the coming 15 years.

India versus China is looking like a one-sided issue

The population trend between China and India is remarkable, although needs to be considered in the context of household spending if it is to impact economic growth.

In India, the population trend is one of the best globally, which works very well given the structure of the economy, whereby household spending accounts for 58.0% of GDP (more than Australia but less than the USA). It could also be argued that India are set for greater household effectiveness, especially given the low GDP per capita baseline (relative to mature economies) and an intense focus on education standards. On this basis, it seems to be a glaring opportunity for Australia to redirect its exports; however, this won’t be without challenges as India is far more self-reliant than China and does not have the same need for iron ore or coal.

China on the other hand, has a far worse population trend despite the scrapping of the one-child policy. However, it is also important to realise China are far less reliant on household spending to drive economic growth. In fact, Chinese household spending accounts for only 37.4% of GDP, meaning a falling population may have a smaller impact if trade continues to grow. There is also scope to grow GDP per capita by a significant margin, which could add to total GDP beyond the concerning population trend.

Deeper analysis of the working population

An added advantage for India is that they have a young population. This means more workers and less retirees, which by extension implies a greater ability to earn more income and hence increase household spending. There are many ways to explain this concept, but one of the most important from an investors perspective is to view the ‘prime’ working population, defined by 45-64 year olds. Some people are calling this the “peak spender theory”.


What can we learn from the above?

Based on this evidence, a falling population growth rate could have substantial implications for the future economy. A living example is Japan, where a falling population has created the “lost decade(s)” despite some of the strongest growth rates in GDP on a per capita basis. For many of the key economies, including the USA and China, this falling population growth rate could have material implications and be deep-rooted as a structural headwind to long-term growth.

Whether this causes an economic disaster is a much harder question. On face value, there is enough evidence to suggest that falling population growth rates are severe enough to substantially increase the risk of an economic demise. This logic follows the path that lower growth increases the risk of periodic recessions and hence creates potential for social unrest and debt-fuelled policies (we are already seeing this in the USA, Europe and Japan).

However, there is insufficient evidence to suggest the inevitability of an economic demise on the basis of population trends alone. On this note, it is important to reiterate the difference between a falling population and a falling growth rate in the population. The latter is far less severe, which would explain the difference between Japan (which has suffered a falling population), versus the USA (a slowing growth rate).



Worried about a property crash? These nine facts answer it better than most…

| Investing Times News, Lifestyle, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
What causes a property market to crash? Is it a falling economy? An unemployment outburst? A building oversupply? Should we concentrate on consumer confidence data? Or is it as simple...

Long-term investment themes: 10 year + view of the trends, opportunities and challenges

| Economy, Investing Times News, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
Drawing attention to the outlook and big themes present in the economy is always a healthy perspective. Below are a number of key themes to think about as you monitor your...

Facts about the Chinese economy: How likely is a financial crisis in China?

| Economy, Investing Times News, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments
China is undoubtedly important to the global economy and with embedded signs of rising bad debts, there are enormous concerns surrounding China’s ongoing stability. Since 2005, China has accounted for...

It’s not (totally) the baby boomers fault: Why the working population matters most

| Headline Article, Most Viewed, Recommended by the Investing Times | No Comments

We have an unprecedented rise in the over 65 age group and our working population is growing at a more modest rate. This article will detail the real problems we face and how you can profit from it.

Investing Times Issues



17 stock metrics: value, growth, dividend strength, stability, momentum and sector analysis

| Investing Times News, Most Viewed, Share-Market | No Comments
If we agree the primary objective of stock-picking is to pick the winners and/or avoid the losers, then we must start with a framework that helps determine which companies to...

Could Donald Trump send the USA bankrupt? And why the first challenge is February next year.

| Most Viewed, Politics | No Comments
Donald Trump and economic stability rarely go hand-in-hand. While Trump insists he’ll "make this country rich again", his path to riches has been subjected to four bankruptcy negotiations and his...

Recession risks: what are 10 of the top indicators to watch and why it works.

| Economy, Headline Article, Most Viewed | No Comments
What does it take to identify an impending recession? Obviously, this is an extremely complex question. However, there are at least 10 factors that have had a strong historical track-record...

Can Warren Buffett and Robert Shiller both be wrong at the same time? Unlikely.

| Investing Times News, Most Viewed, Share-Market | No Comments
Warren Buffett and Robert Shiller should be familiar names to anyone with an active interest in the share-market. They are two of the most respected individuals on the planet when...